Shakespeare Plays Available in Video Format
Scholars Online Educational Resources

Home

All’s Well That Ends Well
Antony and Cleopatra
As You Like It
The Comedy of Errors
Coriolanus
Cymbeline
Hamlet
Henry IV, part 1
Henry IV, part 2
Henry V
Henry VI, part 1
Henry VI, part 2
Henry VI, part 3
Henry VIII
Julius Caesar
King John
King Lear
Love’s Labour’s Lost
Macbeth
Measure for Measure
The Merchant of Venice
The Merry Wives of Windsor
A Midsummer Night’s Dream
Much Ado About Nothing
Othello
Pericles
Richard II
Richard III
Romeo and Juliet
The Taming of the Shrew
The Tempest
Timon of Athens
Titus Andronicus
Troilus and Cressida
Twelfth Night
Two Gentlemen of Verona
The Winter’s Tale
Shakespeareana

Available versions

1960: George Schaefer

1979: Derek Jarman

1980: John Gorrie

1982: Herb Roland

1983: William Woodman

2011: Julie Taymor

2012: Des McAnuff

2013: Jeremy Herrin


Adaptations

1956: Forbidden Planet

1982: Tempest

1998: The Tempest

1991: Prospero’s Books

1992: Stanislav Sokolov, Dave Edwards (animated)


Educational

2013: Shakespeare Uncovered (Season 1, Ep. 4)


The Tempest

The Tempest is one of Shakespeare’s best-loved plays, and one of the hardest to carry off plausibly. It is an airy tissue of language and fancy: it requires actors capable of capturing the arabesques of its verse and also of supporting the credulity that the story itself demands. The verse is similarly poised between comedy and tragedy, and infused everywhere with a kind of melancholy: it requires an exceptional degree of balance between the extravagant and the restrained that almost no other play in the corpus demands. One can overdo one or another element of A Midsummer Night’s Dream and still have a serviceable old warhorse capable of solid amusement if not delight; one can emphasize this or that aspect of Hamlet or Othello to the detriment of another, and still have plenty of insightful material to digest.

The price of failure in The Tempest is more extreme. If the whole does not cohere and sing, it collapses. If one cannot grasp the lyricism, the humor, and the serious reflection on art all at the same time, the production becomes dull and almost intolerable. When the play works, however, it is unparallelled, and deserves study and attention. Shakespeare has moreover put into the mouths of his most extravagantly strange characters — especially the wicked Caliban and the sprite Ariel — some of his most colorful and subtle language, and when those parts are played well, the effect is brilliant.

A play quintessentially designed for the stage, it depends as much as any other in the corpus on the dynamic existing between players and audience, and perhaps for that reason it does not easily survive the transition to film. Several of the available versions capture at least part of the play’s wonder and magic; none of them can really convey it all. The BBC Shakespeare Plays production (1980: John Gorrie) is among the most leaden of the whole series. Perhaps the most interesting one is the Canadian Stratford version (1982: Herb Roland). Others have their own virtues and their own defects.